Hi, On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 08:48:02AM -0700, Higham, Josh wrote: > > GigabitEthernet0/10 is up, line protocol is up (connected) > > 5 minute input rate 19432000 bits/sec, 32108 packets/sec > > 5 minute output rate 380792000 bits/sec, 46406 packets/sec > > > > As you see, the ports are far from saturated, and even the > > load from all > > "ingress" ports (380 Mbit + 27 Mbit + 26 Mbit) is far from > > the capacity > > of the "egress" port (G0/10). > > As an aside, you can get more accurate numbers by configuring > 'load-interval 30' on each interface. In the last discussion on this > list I believe there wasn't an significant CPU impact.
Well, yes, of course. It won't make a significant difference here,
though - on a macroscopic timescale ("minutes") the traffic is fairly
steady, and no big changes during the day.
Short bursts (<10 seconds) won't be properly visible in these counters
either way.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpM91LAEHlbF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
