Hi, On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 07:51:01PM +0300, Nitzan Tzelniker wrote: > We saw similar problem and we solve it by doing etherchannel on the output > interface.
Thanks. I have considered this, but I'm unhappy with this for a number of
reasons - the biggest obstacle is that the next-hop device currently cannot
do 2xGE port channeling.
The other thing is that with the fairly low load on the switch, I don't
really think going to a second GE port can be explained to those that
have to pay for the costs of upgrading the other end... (we're below 60%
load on the egress port).
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpV0xVPahhtz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
