I see you have your PVC as vbr-nrt.

Orig poster has UBR

When we've tested QoS on ADSL we found the PVC had to be configured as VBR-NRT to make QOS work. this may be the issue here.

I'm sure I found a reference on CCO to this behaviour but cant find it again quickly.

Regards
Dean
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Turnbow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Victor Cappuccio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Networkers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7206VXR and CBWFQ


Please don't tell that  to this router


policy-map llq
 class sipRTP
   priority 512
 class class-default
   fair-queue
   random-detect

vc-class atm CVPHDSL-VoIP
 vbr-nrt 1524 1524
 encapsulation aal5snap


interface ATM3/0.20842 point-to-point
description cust 1
 ip address192.168.0.41 255.255.255.252
pvc CVPH_CUSTVOIP 208/42
 class-vc CVPHDSL-VoIP
 service-policy out llq

7200-accessjn3#sh policy-map int ATM3/0.20842
ATM3/0.20842: VC 208/42 -

 Service-policy output: llq

   queue stats for all priority classes:

     queue limit 64 packets
     (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0
     (pkts output/bytes output) 5466056/418685691

   Class-map: sipRTP (match-all)
     5466056 packets, 418685691 bytes
     5 minute offered rate 61000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
     Match: access-group 5
     Priority: 512 kbps, burst bytes 12800, b/w exceed drops: 0

   Class-map: class-default (match-any)
     492783 packets, 493906760 bytes
     5 minute offered rate 509000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
     Match: any
       492783 packets, 493906760 bytes
       5 minute rate 509000 bps
     Queueing
     queue limit 64 packets
     (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops/flowdrops) 0/50/0/50
     (pkts output/bytes output) 492733/493866217
     Fair-queue: per-flow queue limit 16
       Exp-weight-constant: 9 (1/512)
       Mean queue depth: 0 packets
class Transmitted Random drop Tail/Flow drop Minimum Maximum Mark pkts/bytes pkts/bytes pkts/bytes thresh thresh prob

0 486842/493318682 0/0 50/40543 20 40 1/10 1 54/22464 0/0 0/0 22 40 1/10 2 6/746 0/0 0/0 24 40 1/10 3 0/0 0/0 0/0 26 40 1/10 4 5/330 0/0 0/0 28 40 1/10 5 20/1200 0/0 0/0 30 40 1/10 6 5753/515372 0/0 0/0 32 40 1/10 7 53/7423 0/0 0/0 34 40 1/10


http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk39/tk824/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094cf6.shtml



Brian




________________________________

From: Victor Cappuccio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: venerdì 17 ottobre 2008 18.52
To: Brian Turnbow
Cc: Networkers; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7206VXR and CBWFQ


Hi,

Subinterfaces and software interfaces do not have their own separate transmit (Tx) ring; therefore, no congestion can occur. These interface types include dialers, tunnels, and Frame Relay subinterfaces, and will only congest when their main hardware interface Tx ring congests. The Tx ring state is an indication of congestion for software interfaces.


router(config)# interface Serial0/0.1
router(config-subif)# service-policy output test
CBWFQ : Not supported on subinterfaces


1.- Create a child or lower-level policy that configures a queueing mechanism. In the example below, we configure LLQ using the priority command and CBWFQ using the bandwidth command. Refer to Congestion Management Overview for more information.

         policy-map child
          class voice
           priority 512

2. Create a parent or top-level policy that applies class-based shaping. Apply the child policy as a command under the parent policy since the admission control for the child class is done based on the shaping rate for the parent class.

         policy-map parent
          class class-default
           shape average 2000000
           service-policy child

3. Apply the parent policy to the subinterface.

         interface Serial0/0.1
          service-policy parent

Cisco Page: http://tinyurl.com/ytt8ge

Note: Class-based shaping works at the interface and subinterface level. Cisco IOS 12.2(2.5) introduces the ability to configure shaping on the main interface and IP addresses on the subinterfaces.

thanks,

Victor Cappuccio
CCIE R/S# 20657
CCSI# 30452
www.anetworkerblog.com


On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Brian Turnbow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Your pvc needs to be abr/vbr/cbr
You can't do it on ubr

Regards

Brian






-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Networkers

Sent: venerdì 17 ottobre 2008 17.10
To: [email protected]
Subject: [c-nsp] 7206VXR and CBWFQ


Whenever I try to apply the following I get an error message about how
CBWFQ can't be applied to subinterfaces.  What is the correct way to do
this?

Thanks,
Chris

class-map match-any VOIP
match ip dscp ef
match  precedence 5
class-map match-all CRITICAL
match access-group 100

policy-map MyCBWFQ
class CRITICAL
 priority 48
class VOIP
 bandwidth 320
 set precedence 6

vc-class atm MyClass
ubr 1536
encapsulation aal5mux ppp Virtual-Template5

interface Virtual-Template5
ip unnumbered Loopback0
service-policy output MyCBWFQ
peer default ip address pool default
ppp authentication pap callin

interface ATM2/0.1921 point-to-point
pvc 1/1921
class-vc MyClass







_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/





--


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to