Hey there. Does anybody here happen to have any experience working with pseudo wires that are port-tunneled on one side and vlan-tunneled on the other? Having a bear of a time trying to figure out why I cannot pass any traffic over a vc that's configured in this fashion.
Switch A (7609/rsp720-3cxl-10ge) ------ MPLS ------ Switch B (7609/rsp720-3cxl-10ge) Both switches have LAN cards only (no SIP or FlexWAN here) and run 12.2(33)SRC3 Switch A ------------- interface GigabitEthernet2/1 mtu 9216 no ip address load-interval speed nonegotiate xconnect <Switch B IP> 100 encapsulation mpls end Switch B ------------- interface TenGigabitEthernet3/1 mtu 9216 no ip address load-interval 30 end interface TenGigabitEthernet3/1.100 encapsulation dot1Q 100 xconnect <Switch A IP> 100 encapsulation mpls end The VC comes up fine on both sides, but the only way I can get any traffic to pass is if I'm either vlan-tunneled or port-tunneled on both sides. So far I'm hearing conflicting things from TAC on whether this will work or not. The maddening part is that we already have VCs in place where type 4 to type 5 VCs work just fine. The difference in at least one of the working cases is that the port-tunneled VC is on a 6500 running 12.2(18)SXF9. I'm a bit apprehensive about debugging this issue in production right now and TAC has been slow to get back with me so I'd appreciate any feedback. Thanks, Laurent _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
