On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Saku Ytti <[email protected]> wrote: > On (2009-02-13 12:02 -0500), Laurent Geyer wrote: > >> Does anybody here happen to have any experience working with pseudo >> wires that are port-tunneled on one side and vlan-tunneled on the >> other? Having a bear of a time trying to figure out why I cannot pass > > You need to configure interworking. Instead of encap mpls, > use pw-class foo and configure foo as ethernet interworking.
Ok, so ethernet interworking defines the pseudo wire type, you still have to configure mpls encapsulation. I can see why you would have to define that in a pseudo wire class, but if you're configuring the encapsulation on an interface the VC type should be implicit. Any reason why you believe I need to use pseudo wire classes here? - Laurent _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
