Peter Rathlev wrote:
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 14:01 -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
netflow on the 65xx is broken enough i'm surprised it gave you any
data of value.
Hm, I thought it worked okay. Out of curiosity, what should one be
careful about with it, if one's network was dominated by 6500s?
We only use it for troubleshooting though, so precision is less
important for us if that's the problem.
I wouldn't use it for accounting but with the right sampling it
can be used to see how much traffic you are sending to/from
other ASN's. I use:
mls sampling packet-based 1024 8192
Which gives a convenient ~1000 conversion factor from indicated
bandwidth to actual.
- Kevin
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
