how many routed interfaces do you have ( sh ip int brief with ip addresses ) ? if more than 8 change the sdm template to routing you can use sh platform ip unicast failed route to see if routes are failing to be programmed into tcam Brian ________________________________
From: Chris Lane [mailto:clane1...@gmail.com] Sent: venerdì 24 aprile 2009 11.17 To: Brian Turnbow Cc: Peter Rathlev; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 3750 High Cpu IP Input sh controllers cpu-interface ASIC Rxbiterr Rxunder Fwdctfix Txbuflos Rxbufloc Rxbufdrain ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASIC0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ASIC1 0 0 0 0 0 0 cpu-queue-frames retrieved dropped invalid hol-block stray ----------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- rpc 0 0 0 0 0 stp 1807 0 0 0 0 ipc 0 0 0 0 0 routing protocol 1516326 0 0 0 0 L2 protocol 27 0 0 0 0 remote console 0 0 0 0 0 sw forwarding 915 0 0 0 0 host 2014 0 0 0 0 broadcast 1766 0 0 0 0 cbt-to-spt 0 0 0 0 0 igmp snooping 1518651 0 0 0 0 icmp 45 0 0 0 0 logging 0 0 0 0 0 rpf-fail 0 0 0 0 0 queue14 0 0 0 0 0 cpu heartbeat 14116 0 0 0 0 ODD i have disabled IGMP SNOOPING... On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Brian Turnbow <b.turn...@twt.it> wrote: You can use show controller cpu to help see whats going to the cpu Make sure you have no ip redirects and no proxy arp on all the interfaces. How many routed interfaces do you have ? The output below for "max" is for 8 routed interfaces if you have more you should change to the desktop switching template. With your roughly your values for indirectly connected routes and 13 ip interfaces on a box I needed to switch the template "sdm prefer routing" requies reload. Regards Brian -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Lane Sent: venerdì 24 aprile 2009 1.09 To: Peter Rathlev Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 3750 High Cpu IP Input sh platform tcam utilization CAM Utilization for ASIC# 0 Max Used Masks/Values Masks/values Unicast mac addresses: 784/6272 37/235 IPv4 IGMP groups + multicast routes: 144/1152 6/26 IPv4 unicast directly-connected routes: 784/6272 37/235 IPv4 unicast indirectly-connected routes: 272/2176 52/326 IPv4 policy based routing aces: 0/0 0/0 IPv4 qos aces: 528/528 18/18 IPv4 security aces: 1024/1024 57/57 Note: Allocation of TCAM entries per feature uses a complex algorithm. The above information is meant to provide an abstract view of the current TCAM utilization Hope this helps. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Peter Rathlev <pe...@rathlev.dk> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 16:15 -0400, Chris Lane wrote: > > This box has been in production for over a year and doesn't really do > > to much as you can see from my orig thread it moves about 11MB. > > > > This just started late last night yet we didn't add any new customer > > nor did anybody even touch switch as the device is remote. > > > > I read in an older thread regarding same thing that the person > > rebooted and of course it resolved issue. I am planning to do that > > Early tomorrow am, but > > i really want to know what the heck is causing this. > > > > Yes CEF is running. > > What about TCAM utilisation ("show platform tcam utilization")? > > Regards, > Peter > > > -- //CL _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ -- //CL _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
