On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 14:57 -0500, Jason Link wrote: > With an ASA running a redundant physical interface pair for the Inside > interface, each link connected to a separate switch which is connected > to a separate router, and everything running EIGRP, I get multiple > routes (2) to the same destination subnet, one for each of the connected > routers. This is obviously causing problems, and I can't seem to find a > way to resolve it. Setting delay on the physical interfaces doesn't > seem to take effect, and there is no variance sub-command so I can't > just force one route. This needs to function in a redundant situation, > as in if I lose a router or switch everything will continue to function > (hence the redundant interface). I tried google and cisco and found > nothing of any significance...anyone got any ideas?
AFAIK the "standard" way of doing this would be a shared VLAN on the inside and then HSRP or similar on the routers. Any reason for not doing that? Regards, Peter _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
