6500 platform. Last time we had 'mls qos' enabled we had massive speed/packet loss issues with interfaces over 40% utilization since we don't classify traffic.
Is there any possible issues you might see? -- Randy ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Ian MacKinnon <[email protected]> To: Randy McAnally <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:44:57 +0100 Subject: RE: [c-nsp] service-policy on virtual interface > Hi Randy, > What platform? > On 6500/7600 the answer is yes, you need mls qos vlan-based on the > physical interfaces and then you can police on the SVI. > > Ian > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Randy McAnally Sent: 08 > September 2009 11:40 To: [email protected] Subject: [c-nsp] > service-policy on virtual interface > > Do the same commands work e.g. 'service-policy input/output > FooPolicy' at the virtual interface level the same as they do on a > physical port, both in and out? > > I'm trying to set up rate limiting 'further up the line' rather than > at the network edge, so we can pool customer bandwidth and keep > inbound floods of traffic from being passed beyond the distribution layer. > > -- > Randy > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.81/2350 - Release Date: > 09/07/09 18:03:00 > > -- > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. > Any offers or quotation of service are subject to formal specification. > Errors and omissions excepted. Please note that any views or > opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and > do not necessarily represent those of Lumison. Finally, the > recipient should check this email and any attachments for the > presence of viruses. Lumison accept no liability for any damage > caused by any virus transmitted by this email. ------- End of Original Message ------- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
