Not seen problems turning on mls qos. We have on the physicals :- Int gi1/1 mls qos vlan-based mls qos trust dscp and a typical service policy looks like :- policy-map 10MegPolice class class-default police 10000000 26000 32000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit violate-action drop
what do you mean you don't classify? Ian -----Original Message----- From: Randy McAnally [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 08 September 2009 11:54 To: Ian MacKinnon; [email protected] Subject: RE: [c-nsp] service-policy on virtual interface 6500 platform. Last time we had 'mls qos' enabled we had massive speed/packet loss issues with interfaces over 40% utilization since we don't classify traffic. Is there any possible issues you might see? -- Randy ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Ian MacKinnon <[email protected]> To: Randy McAnally <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:44:57 +0100 Subject: RE: [c-nsp] service-policy on virtual interface > Hi Randy, > What platform? > On 6500/7600 the answer is yes, you need mls qos vlan-based on the > physical interfaces and then you can police on the SVI. > > Ian > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Randy McAnally Sent: 08 > September 2009 11:40 To: [email protected] Subject: [c-nsp] > service-policy on virtual interface > > Do the same commands work e.g. 'service-policy input/output > FooPolicy' at the virtual interface level the same as they do on a > physical port, both in and out? > > I'm trying to set up rate limiting 'further up the line' rather than > at the network edge, so we can pool customer bandwidth and keep > inbound floods of traffic from being passed beyond the distribution layer. > > -- > Randy > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.81/2350 - Release Date: > 09/07/09 18:03:00 > > -- > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. > Any offers or quotation of service are subject to formal specification. > Errors and omissions excepted. Please note that any views or > opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and > do not necessarily represent those of Lumison. Finally, the > recipient should check this email and any attachments for the > presence of viruses. Lumison accept no liability for any damage > caused by any virus transmitted by this email. ------- End of Original Message ------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.81/2350 - Release Date: 09/07/09 18:03:00 -- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. Any offers or quotation of service are subject to formal specification. Errors and omissions excepted. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Lumison. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. Lumison accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
