Out of curiosity, what is ping based routing? 02 PM, jack daniels <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi , > > I can run any protocol , cant run tunnel as other side is client who cant > make changes > > > > > On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Vincent C Jones < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 21:06 +0530, jack daniels wrote: > > > I have a scenario - > > > > > > CE -------ISP1 > > > | > > > | > > > | > > > ISP2 > > > > > > users behind CE connect to remote application , > > > Now issue is if ISP1 LINK or ISP1 goes down I have times less than 4 > sec > > > for application to go via other link so that users are not imacted. > > > So can there be any solution for traffic to converge before 2 request > > > timeouts , so that my application users are not impacted. > > > > There are a wide variety of solutions, but whether or not they will work > > for you depends very much on both the specifics of the application and > > how you connect to your ISPs. Classic dual-homed BGP is not one of the > > solutions given your timeout requirements. "Ping based routing" may do > > the job if your user application can tolerate changing public IP > > addresses. If you have a presence at both ends of the public internet > > connection, you could also look at tunnel based solutions. > > > > -- > > Vincent C. Jones > > Networking Unlimited, Inc. > > Phone: +1 201 568-7810 > > [email protected] > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
