Ivan has this similar article with an working example applicable in real-life: http://www.nil.com/ipcorner/SmallSiteMultiHoming/
pelase read this article properly. might help you :) If the above article does not work for you; could you please b more specific about the issue like what is causing delay and what is the precise topology of the logical network like protocols, media and transmission. Kind Regards, Masood Blogs: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/ > Gotcha. I am familiar with using SLA to track a route, but there is still > the issue of convergence within the ISPs. We implemented a similar > configuration in my environment using AS prepend on the least favored > link, > but it takes several minutes to converge "globally." > > Thanks for the link. > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:52 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> have a look at the following URL.. >> >> http://www.ciscoblog.com/archives/2008/08/dynamic_failove.html >> >> Kind Regards, >> Masood >> Blogs: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/ >> >> >> > Out of curiosity, what is ping based routing? >> > >> > 02 PM, jack daniels <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi , >> >> >> >> I can run any protocol , cant run tunnel as other side is client who >> >> cant >> >> make changes >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Vincent C Jones < >> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 21:06 +0530, jack daniels wrote: >> >> > > I have a scenario - >> >> > > >> >> > > CE -------ISP1 >> >> > > | >> >> > > | >> >> > > | >> >> > > ISP2 >> >> > > >> >> > > users behind CE connect to remote application , >> >> > > Now issue is if ISP1 LINK or ISP1 goes down I have times less >> than 4 >> >> sec >> >> > > for application to go via other link so that users are not >> imacted. >> >> > > So can there be any solution for traffic to converge before 2 >> >> request >> >> > > timeouts , so that my application users are not impacted. >> >> > >> >> > There are a wide variety of solutions, but whether or not they will >> >> work >> >> > for you depends very much on both the specifics of the application >> and >> >> > how you connect to your ISPs. Classic dual-homed BGP is not one of >> the >> >> > solutions given your timeout requirements. "Ping based routing" may >> do >> >> > the job if your user application can tolerate changing public IP >> >> > addresses. If you have a presence at both ends of the public >> internet >> >> > connection, you could also look at tunnel based solutions. >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Vincent C. Jones >> >> > Networking Unlimited, Inc. >> >> > Phone: +1 201 568-7810 >> >> > [email protected] >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> > >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
