I was going by the 'show proc cpu hist' he gave for both the SP and RP. Both looked pretty bad across the board.
Chuck -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 10:56 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Best practice - Core vs Access Router On 09/02/10 15:03, Church, Charles wrote: > The weird part is the NDE process is still using CPU. Which netflow setting > are you using for 'mls flow ip xxx'? Since both the RP and SP CPU are What evidence do we have for the RP and SP both being hit? > getting crushed at times, seems like more than just a punted packet issue, > since that would be primarily RP, wouldn't it? Not if it were a loop _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
