The only chassis-related RMA I have experienced were 1) several times the chassis came damaged due to transport
2) a failed env-mon PCB on a 7500 lots of years ago. The folk from TAC has sent me a new chassis only to replace the tiny PCB and send the chassis back :) -- deejay > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Dirk-Jan van Helmond > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 2:53 PM > To: <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Chassis Failure Rate > > Once, a 6500. > > We had an environment with 8x 6500, this was a new one. When we brought > it into service we had very strange behavior. Dropping OSPF sessions, > packet-loss, etc. > We swapped everything (sup, linecards, even PSUs) before the chassis > backplane became a suspect. The new chassis solved all problems. > > > rgds, > Dirk > > > > On Feb 25, 2010, at 2:34 PM, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Just a quick consensus. > > > > Have many people experienced chassis/backplane failure in the > 45xx/65xx/76xx lines? I have not yet (knock on wood) and I would just > like to know if people have experienced this and how often. I have > read a few posts where this has happened. > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
