On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Tony Varriale <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looks right to me.  No match statement = bad.
>

Why is that bad? Most docs I went through say something like this:

"If no match statement is configured under a route map statement, the
default action is to
match everything." Doesn't look bad to me.

By the way, statement # 10 is the first in my route-map.

Andy

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to