I prefer my configs to be deterministic in what I am trying to accomplish.
If you would have had a match statement and achieved had the same outcome,
would you be: less, more or have the same amount of confuzzlement?
To each their own.
tv
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy B." <[email protected]>
To: "Tony Varriale" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] route-map IN / OUT deny issue
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Tony Varriale <[email protected]> wrote:
Looks right to me. No match statement = bad.
Why is that bad? Most docs I went through say something like this:
"If no match statement is configured under a route map statement, the
default action is to
match everything." Doesn't look bad to me.
By the way, statement # 10 is the first in my route-map.
Andy
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
