We've had one of those, was accepted for RMA without any further questions through channel partner.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <[email protected] > wrote: > One year after the original post, i "finally" met the same issue on a > 6748-GE-TX card. > Anyone got any complaints from Cisco about RMAing it? > > -- > Tassos > > Jay Ford wrote on 29/05/2009 16:58: > >> On Fri, 29 May 2009, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: >> >>> Can someone please take a photo and upload it somewhere, so everyone else >>> can better understand what exactly is the issue you're talking about? >>> >> >> Take a look at: >> http://myweb.uiowa.edu/jnford/images/IMG_0589.jpg >> http://myweb.uiowa.edu/jnford/images/IMG_0590.jpg >> The first shows the "Z1" socket in the background with the fuzzy loop in >> the foreground. The second shows the heat fin & loop in the foregraound with >> the socket in the background. The loop is supposed to be in the Z1 socket. >> >> Based on the responses I've received it seems that this is a fairly common >> failure due to a design flaw. I got the usual "that's strange; nobody else >> is having this problem" from Cisco. I now have ample justification for >> telling them "bull". >> >> Thanks everybody. >> >> Jay >> >> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
