On 19 Apr 2010, at 10:33, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote: > > Can you do it for v6 peer? It is not possible to do it within the neighbor > configuration, when I create a v4v6 neighbor group I get: > > Failed to commit one or more configuration items during an atomic operation > > !!% Change would result in neighbor (X:Y:W::Z) being activated with an > invalid address family
I believe you cannot, due to the fact that there is no method by which an IPv4 route can have an IPv6 next-hop that I've seen in IOS, whereas the other way round it is possible due to IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses [RFC4291]. I'm not sure on the practicality of implementing such a mechanism, as it would perhaps depend on how the FIB is implemented. I cannot, however, see a reason why it would not be possible to implement this, theoretically. Kind regards, Rob -- Rob Shakir <[email protected]> Network Development Engineer GX Networks/Vialtus Solutions ddi: +44208 587 6077 mob: +44797 155 4098 pgp: 0xc07e6deb nic-hdl: RJS-RIPE This email is subject to: http://www.vialtus.com/disclaimer.html _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
