Sorry about that, I've missed the very important detail that he was talking 
about NPE-400... Oops.
That's what happens when you read mails fast and answer before it reaches the 
grey brain cells... :-)


-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Doering [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 11:13 AM
To: Ziv Leyes
Cc: 'Richey'; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Console problems

Hi,

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 09:25:43AM +0300, Ziv Leyes wrote:
> You can't have both NPE and I/O card console interfaces to work together.
> I'm not sure if it's configurable but the default will be the I/O card, so if 
> you MUST have the I/O card inserted use the console port on it and not the 
> one on the NPE

The NPE-400 doesn't have a console port :-) - and *does* require an IO board.

(Your statement is correct for NPE-G1 and NPE-G2).

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025                        [email protected]

 
 
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************




_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to