On Friday 16 July 2010 07:55:53 am roy wrote: > I should have also specified about 7 full feeds > distributed between them. So, more or less, each would > be taking only ~5 full max. Will NPE-G100 be as much as > an option vs NSE-100?
I've tested an NPE-G2 with about 7 full feeds in the past (when the boards had just launched). It got a little slow, but was usable. That was pre-SR* days, so... > Although the consensus goes to ASR1K, are there any > equivalent vendorJ/vendorH as alternatives > price-to-performance-wise (M7i/M10i)? The M7i/M10i aren't equal comparisons when it comes to the ASR1000, although, I should say, product-for-product, it's what's on the boards from Juniper. If Ethernet is what you're really playing for, consider Juniper's MX80. If you need something with a little hardware redundancy too (power, fans, control planes), you'll certainly be looking at something bigger from Juniper. That may skew things, somewhat. Until Juniper can release a box targeted directly at the ASR1000 line, the M7i/M10i would be the most obvious choice, if that platform's age isn't an issue. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
