Aside from the MX line being devoted specifically to ethernet interfaces, in what way is an MX-80 not a good competitor to (for example) an ASR1002?
Phil P On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Mark Tinka <[email protected]>wrote: > On Friday 16 July 2010 07:55:53 am roy wrote: > > > I should have also specified about 7 full feeds > > distributed between them. So, more or less, each would > > be taking only ~5 full max. Will NPE-G100 be as much as > > an option vs NSE-100? > > I've tested an NPE-G2 with about 7 full feeds in the past > (when the boards had just launched). It got a little slow, > but was usable. That was pre-SR* days, so... > > > Although the consensus goes to ASR1K, are there any > > equivalent vendorJ/vendorH as alternatives > > price-to-performance-wise (M7i/M10i)? > > The M7i/M10i aren't equal comparisons when it comes to the > ASR1000, although, I should say, product-for-product, it's > what's on the boards from Juniper. > > If Ethernet is what you're really playing for, consider > Juniper's MX80. If you need something with a little hardware > redundancy too (power, fans, control planes), you'll > certainly be looking at something bigger from Juniper. That > may skew things, somewhat. > > Until Juniper can release a box targeted directly at the > ASR1000 line, the M7i/M10i would be the most obvious choice, > if that platform's age isn't an issue. > > Cheers, > > Mark. > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
