On Monday, July 19, 2010 07:49:58 pm Phil Pierotti wrote: > Aside from the MX line being devoted specifically to > ethernet interfaces, in what way is an MX-80 not a good > competitor to (for example) an ASR1002?
What would stand out the most, for me, is that the MX80 won't do SONET/SDH or some other non-Ethernet services. That said, one would suspect that Juniper could come out with non-Ethernet MIC's, particularly POS-based units. Whether they make cost-sense to operators or not, is another issue :-). Of course, if your network is largely or solely Ethernet, the choice is obvious given the scaling requirements. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
