On Friday, September 03, 2010 05:11:29 am Kameron Gasso wrote: > Under the guise of "managing my priorities" (read: > "laziness"), I don't generally create A records to match > for interface IPs -- I've honestly never found a > practical use for it. Our NMS connects by IP, I don't > connect to those addresses frequently enough to warrant > doing so by name, and I've yet to see a traceroute > implementation that cares about matching > forward/reverse.
We do the same. A + PTR records for Loopback (or Management interface if Loopback is not applicable), and then only PTR records for physical interfaces. We haven't seen much use to have A records for physical interfaces. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
