The problem with 7600 is the limited throughput of the IPSEC module for SPA-600. It would require a grand total of 16 IPSEC modules in 8 SPA-600 carriers to achieve throughput goals...
Rubens On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Benjamin Lovell <[email protected]> wrote: > I was not aware that there was an IPSEC blade for the 9K like there is for > the 7600. If there is not then obviously your would need to put something > like an ASA in-line but then it should work fine. > > -Ben > > On Oct 27, 2010, at 6:36 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote: > >> After reading ASR-9000 specs no CCO, seems to me that is not possible >> to do Layer 2 transport with IPSEC with it, either using L2TPv3 (like >> ASR-1000) or VPLS (like 7600). Is that really true, or am I missing >> something ? >> >> >> Rubens >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
