(replying all this time). If you have access to the bug toolkit also check out CSCsl72880.
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Pete Lumbis <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe that this is because it's a CFC module. It's just telling > you that hardware forwarding won't happen on the linecard and will > happen on the RP. > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr > <[email protected]> wrote: >> The other LC hardware version is 2.9. Both LCs have standard CFC modules, no >> DFCs. >> >> Under CLI, I can see mpls commands and sub-commands. >> >> Just wanted to know the meaning of the message That's appeared in the logs, >> probably purely informational. >> >> Can anyone confirm for sure ? >> >> Y. >> >> >> >> Le 21 nov. 2010 à 17:42, Nick Hilliard <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >>> On 21/11/2010 16:38, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote: >>>> Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw >>>> Status >>>> --- ---------------------------------- ------ ------------ ------------ >>>> ------- >>>> 7 0025.84d7.89cc to 0025.84d7.89cf 3.1 12.2(14r)S5 12.2(33)SXH2 Ok >>>> >>> [...] >>>> No DFC installed on it ! >>> >>> hardware looks ok then. 3.1 is fine, and so long as you didn't accidentally >>> install a dfc3a, it should be ok. >>> >>> Nick >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
