On 11/24/10 1:33 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote: > Re Nick, > > [email protected] (Nick Hilliard) wrote: > >>>> Will try that - this sounds like the easiest way, although I dislike >>>> special constructs normally. But - this would allow me to keep the >>>> portfast setting which definitely helps when dealing with workstations... >> >> This isn't a special construct: it's the recommended way to handle cisco >> voip phones >> with desktop ethernet support. > > Sure, but: This is not a Cisco phone. It works nonetheless, so CDP seems to > not be really necessary. Further testing notwithstanding, of course. >
I use it fine with Polycom phones. ~Seth _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
