Last time I checked the CDP neighbours on one of our access switches with Polycoms attached they showed up as CDP neighbours, didn't look into it though....
On 24 Nov 2010, at 16:52, Seth Mattinen wrote: > On 11/24/10 1:33 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote: >> Re Nick, >> >> [email protected] (Nick Hilliard) wrote: >> >>>>> Will try that - this sounds like the easiest way, although I dislike >>>>> special constructs normally. But - this would allow me to keep the >>>>> portfast setting which definitely helps when dealing with workstations... >>> >>> This isn't a special construct: it's the recommended way to handle cisco >>> voip phones >>> with desktop ethernet support. >> >> Sure, but: This is not a Cisco phone. It works nonetheless, so CDP seems to >> not be really necessary. Further testing notwithstanding, of course. >> > > I use it fine with Polycom phones. > > ~Seth > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
