Phil Mayers <[email protected]> wrote: > > SLB on the 6500 (as opposed to with an ACE module) has caveats; it's > slow (as initial packets are punted to CPU) and Cisco don't really > support it AFAICT. > SLB on our 6500 gave us more trouble than good; it would randomly stop working and was a right pain to diagnose (is any load-balancing reliable, compliant and easy to diagnose?).
I moved to anycast'ing which has worked out far better for us and is a far simplier system to understand: http://www.digriz.org.uk/ha-ospf-anycast Cheers -- Alexander Clouter .sigmonster says: Death is nature's way of telling you to slow down. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
