Hi, On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 01:57:24PM +0000, Zoe O'Connell wrote: > > A 6500/7600 will need more space, more power, and if all you need is > > 10/100, the much higher packet throughput for L3 stuff is likely not > > necessary... > > Just out of interest, do you not find that having switches uplinked at > 1Gb/s unnecessarily limits the throughput of the solution?
It really depends what the bandwidth requirements are - and if all switch
ports are only required to be 10/100, this doesn't sound too hard. But
of course, if every single port is a separate VLAN and actually uses 50%
of the 100mbit, a 7301 won't be able to handle that...
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpQBm5CET8v4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
