Hi, On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:52:04PM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote: > The 6500 are legacy and thus needs to stay. I am aware of the FlexWAN and > it's not a problem getting it. > > The problem that I have is that I am unsure which SPA's in the FlexWAN is > supported and will work on the 6500 platform.
SPAs will not be supported at all in FlexWAN :-) - SPAs are for SIPs,
FlexWAN will eat PAs.
> The SPA-4XT-SERIAL is
> precisely what I need and want to put in my 6500 - but I've seen varied
> results from google in terms of whether it does, or does not, work with the
> FlexWAN on the 6500.
I'm fairly sure it won't even physically fit.
... but if you have a FlexWAN anyway, there's nice 8-port PAs for
E1s (PA-MC-8E1) or X21 (PA-8T).
The other thing about "IPSEC on 6500 being a pain *or* very expensive"
still holds. Forgot that in my original mail.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgp1KorgWnlyj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
