----- Original Message -----
From: "Keegan Holley" <[email protected]>
To: "Cisco NSPs" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 5:50 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] Basic Etherchannel Question
Just wondering what the general consensus was on hard coding vs.
negotiating
etherchannels. I've always hard coded them and viewed the negotiation
protocols as a possible point of failure. I was thinking it may be a way
to
diagnose switchport failures that do not cause the link to go down.
Assuming the contol plane frames will not be sent if the data path goes
unavailable, it seems like it could be a good way to verify the health of
the member links. THoughts?
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
LACP.
tv
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
