On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Phil Mayers wrote:
Using LACP is probably better than not. It might not detect all faults, but it'll probably be better than nothing and it's hard to imagine it causing problems. LACP is pretty mature these days.
Etherchannel without LACP + turning off autoneg is a disaster waiting to happen. You want LACP at all times so that a link that doesn't work or is one-way up doesn't carry traffic.
There are enough failure scenarios anyway, no need to add this as well. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
