On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Simon Lockhart <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon Mar 28, 2011 at 02:22:55PM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote: > > The only thing any of us can really do about that is decline to buy it. > > Otherwise there is no perceivable effect in sales to its lack of IPv6 > > support, and no driving force to get it there. > > Depends what you want to use it for. I've got one (so far) which I'm going > to > be using as an EoMPLS endpoint. It has all the features I need for that. > I suppose, but then you don't have any way to do multipoint topologies. > > If I wanted an ethernet access box that did L3 with IPv4 and IPv6, then I > would > (and do) use a 3560G (or 3560E if I need 10G). > Until need to do mpls. There are also limitations with mac-address tables and the like. Maybe you can use both at the same time? ;) > > Simon > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
