On 27/05/11 15:16, Mark Tinka wrote:
All NAT is evil, but I think NAT64 is less evil because you're not using private IPv4 or private IPv6 addresses (you
Also, if you're feeling optimistic/rosy - a successful IPv6 day experience and reduced "brokenness" rate could result in a near-term reduction of the load on your NAT64 box, if Google/Facebook/Akamai decide they are going to insert production AAAAs. In that scenario, your NAT chokepoint gets *less* loaded and everyone is all smiles.
I know some people don't buy that - but I choose the optimism ;o) _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
