On Friday, May 27, 2011 10:49:25 PM Phil Mayers wrote: > Also, if you're feeling optimistic/rosy - a successful > IPv6 day experience and reduced "brokenness" rate could > result in a near-term reduction of the load on your > NAT64 box, if Google/Facebook/Akamai decide they are > going to insert production AAAAs. In that scenario, your > NAT chokepoint gets *less* loaded and everyone is all > smiles.
Indeed, and that's the general reason we like NAT64, because as v6 keeps getting rolled out more and more, theoretically, the load on your NAT64 routers will reduce, and you don't need to renumber your v6-only customers as v6 goes mainstream. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
