best news I've heard all week :-) thanks again On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday, May 27, 2011 10:49:25 PM Phil Mayers wrote: > >> Also, if you're feeling optimistic/rosy - a successful >> IPv6 day experience and reduced "brokenness" rate could >> result in a near-term reduction of the load on your >> NAT64 box, if Google/Facebook/Akamai decide they are >> going to insert production AAAAs. In that scenario, your >> NAT chokepoint gets *less* loaded and everyone is all >> smiles. > > Indeed, and that's the general reason we like NAT64, because > as v6 keeps getting rolled out more and more, theoretically, > the load on your NAT64 routers will reduce, and you don't > need to renumber your v6-only customers as v6 goes > mainstream. > > Mark. > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
