Thanks everyone! I got it working with the ip local policy. On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Pavel Skovajsa <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Jay, > you can a apply a route-map that would do PBR on the traffic generated by > the router like this: > > route-map LocalPolicy permit 10 > > match ip address PingISP_A > > set interface Serial0/0/0 > > ip local policy route-map LocalPolicy > Seems like your scenario perfectly matches the one described by Ivan > on http://www.nil.com/ipcorner/RedundantMultiHoming/ > -pavel > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Jay Nakamura <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Let's say a router is setup with connection to ISP 1 and ISP 2, which >> are both non-BGP connection and traffic coming in from ISP 1 can't go >> out ISP 2 and visa versa. Default route is set on ISP 1, with IP >> SLA, failover to ISP 2. >> >> I can configure NAT so it will NAT on the correct IP for each egress >> connection. This is not the issue. >> >> Is there a way, for example, a ping to the router coming into ISP2 can >> be sent back out ISP2 when ISP2 is not the default route? Normal PBR >> applied to ingress traffic on the interface so I wasn't sure what >> could be done with traffic originating on the router. >> >> Thanks! >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > >
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
