Try: ip route 216.24.2.0 255.255.255.248 216.24.0.54
Router is complaining because your /29 cant have a base address of .4 On 10/6/11 12:22 PM, "Joseph Mays" <[email protected]> wrote: >It feels strange to be asking a question about something as simple as a >subnet here, but I'm honestly not sure what's going on in this case. >Probably something simple. > >As you can see from the following set of commands, the router is fine >with breaking the following addresses up into /30's, but not fine with >the aggregate of the two routes into a /29. > >gw1.armplc(config)#ip route 216.24.2.4 255.255.255.252 216.24.0.54 >gw1.armplc(config)#no ip route 216.24.2.4 255.255.255.252 216.24.0.54 >gw1.armplc(config)#ip route 216.24.2.8 255.255.255.252 216.24.0.54 >gw1.armplc(config)#no ip route 216.24.2.8 255.255.255.252 216.24.0.54 >gw1.armplc(config)#ip route 216.24.2.4 255.255.255.248 216.24.0.54 >%Inconsistent address and mask > >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
