.0 would be your subnet right? On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Joseph Mays <[email protected]> wrote: > It feels strange to be asking a question about something as simple as a > subnet here, but I'm honestly not sure what's going on in this case. Probably > something simple. > > As you can see from the following set of commands, the router is fine with > breaking the following addresses up into /30's, but not fine with the > aggregate of the two routes into a /29. > > gw1.armplc(config)#ip route 216.24.2.4 255.255.255.252 216.24.0.54 > gw1.armplc(config)#no ip route 216.24.2.4 255.255.255.252 216.24.0.54 > gw1.armplc(config)#ip route 216.24.2.8 255.255.255.252 216.24.0.54 > gw1.armplc(config)#no ip route 216.24.2.8 255.255.255.252 216.24.0.54 > gw1.armplc(config)#ip route 216.24.2.4 255.255.255.248 216.24.0.54 > %Inconsistent address and mask > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
