On 29/11/2011, at 4:14 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: > On Tuesday, November 29, 2011 01:29:41 AM P C wrote: >> I think t-mobile is running public customer trials with >> IPV6-only customers and NAT64. You can sign up here: >> http://www.personal.psu.edu/dvm105/blogs/ipv6/2010/07/t-m >> obile-ipv6-open-trial.html > > We have ours working - of course, Skype and friends don't > work yet (although GTalk is working).
What are people using for an internal NAT64 prefix? We're trialling a v6-only realm in our new datacentre deployment and using NAT64 on ASR1002s to reach the public v4 Internet. The ASR1000s refused to use the well-known 64:ff9b::/96 prefix for stateful NAT64, so I've currently got it running on a FD64::/96 ULA prefix and keen to hear what others are doing. Are you using private space or just using a /96 from your RIR allocated v6 space? Thanks, Tom _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
