Hi Oil, this is not because of the MPLS/VPN number limitation? Thanks and regards, Xu Hu
On 11 Jul, 2012, at 18:41, "Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I have a few ASR9Ks used as PE routers. Due to customer's requirements, a >> lot of VRFs are created, each contains one OSPF instance. It seems the >> ASR9K has put a limit on the maximum number of OSPF processes. >> >> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Jul 11 09:17:26.081 UTC: placed[333]: >> %OS-PLACED-3-PROCESS_EXHAUSTED : Exhausted all instances of placeable >> process ospf possible >> >> Is there any way to know this limit? And how to change it? > > the number of OSPF processes is finite (max 10, but best to not exceed 4), so > please configure the VRF PE-CE routing instances within the same process > (which is different from IOS where you would set up distinct "router ospf > ..." per vrf). A common deployment is to use two processes: One as the core > IGP, and one for all VRFs. > > oli > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
