So what is the MPLS/VPN license limitation for? Thanks and regards, Xu Hu
On 11 Jul, 2012, at 19:10, "Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> I have a few ASR9Ks used as PE routers. Due to customer's requirements, a >>>> lot of VRFs are created, each contains one OSPF instance. It seems the >>>> ASR9K has put a limit on the maximum number of OSPF processes. >>>> >>>> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Jul 11 09:17:26.081 UTC: placed[333]: >>>> %OS-PLACED-3-PROCESS_EXHAUSTED : Exhausted all instances of placeable >>>> process ospf possible >>>> >>>> Is there any way to know this limit? And how to change it? >>> >>> the number of OSPF processes is finite (max 10, but best to not exceed 4), >> so please configure the VRF PE-CE routing instances within the same process >> (which is different from IOS where you would set up distinct "router ospf >> ..." per vrf). A common deployment is to use two processes: One as the core >> IGP, and one for all VRFs. >>> > >> Hi Oil, this is not because of the MPLS/VPN number limitation? > > no, this has nothing to do with VPN license or the like.. we just don't > support a very high number of distinct OSPF processes, and achieve the > required VRF PE-CE scalability differently.. > > oli > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
