Thanks alot for your quick and great answers! Nam
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) < [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> I have a few ASR9Ks used as PE routers. Due to customer's > requirements, a > > >> lot of VRFs are created, each contains one OSPF instance. It seems the > > >> ASR9K has put a limit on the maximum number of OSPF processes. > > >> > > >> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Jul 11 09:17:26.081 UTC: placed[333]: > > >> %OS-PLACED-3-PROCESS_EXHAUSTED : Exhausted all instances of placeable > > >> process ospf possible > > >> > > >> Is there any way to know this limit? And how to change it? > > > > > > the number of OSPF processes is finite (max 10, but best to not exceed > 4), > > so please configure the VRF PE-CE routing instances within the same > process > > (which is different from IOS where you would set up distinct "router ospf > > ..." per vrf). A common deployment is to use two processes: One as the > core > > IGP, and one for all VRFs. > > > > > > Hi Oil, this is not because of the MPLS/VPN number limitation? > > no, this has nothing to do with VPN license or the like.. we just don't > support a very high number of distinct OSPF processes, and achieve the > required VRF PE-CE scalability differently.. > > oli > > -- Nam Nguyen _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
