That's correct. 6PE/6VPE will be supported in 15.2(4)S, Q3Cy12. Regards, Waris
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Aaron Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 2:56 PM To: 'Pshem Kowalczyk' Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] me3600x 6vpe Thanks a bunch, good info. I'll keep looking for 15.2(4)S Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Pshem Kowalczyk [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 4:40 PM To: Aaron Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] me3600x 6vpe Hi, On 18 July 2012 09:20, Aaron <[email protected]> wrote: > Do y'all know if me3600x can do 6vpe ? if so how ? (I mean basic > configs to get going using directly connect pe---ce ip advertisements > of ipv6 prefixes, oh and bare in mind that I already have functional > vpvn4 mpls l3vpn's running..so I just wanna add on v6 capability > (which I understand defines 6vpe)) According to my friendly SE - 6VPE is committed for 15.2.(4)S (likely Q3FY12). > Also, if I use a redundant rr ibgp architecture for my pe's > neighboring for L3VPN's..is there any ipv6 specific configs that will > need to be put on the redundant rr's in order for 6vpe to work? I > read that the sp core remains > ipv4 only even though you enable 6vpe on the edge..so I'm wondering if > I don't have to do anything on the rr's. lemme know You'll have to enable vpnv6 family on the sessions with your 6VPEs. Effectively a copy of your vpnv4 family settings; and except for the family name there is no trace of IPv6 in the config of the RR. kind regards Pshem _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
