Thanks (Id reply inline, but hotmail is being painful with formatting)

So your taking 3 feeds(79513, 159199, 159199 routes) and using ~340Mb(Total, 
not just allocated to bgp)? 

Im currently using ~390Mb(Total) with one full feed (427630 routes)


> 
> Does this help?
> 
> l3-router#sh mem sum
>                 Head    Total(b)     Used(b)     Free(b)   Lowest(b)  
> Largest(b)
> Processor    6B934E0   1883685636   357038688   1526646948   1519396896   
> 1514586884
>       I/O   78000000    67108864     8818592    58290272    58056480    
> 58228700
> Transient   77000000    16777216      141092    16636124    13631488    
> 16586364
> 
> Neighbor     V          AS MsgRcvd MsgSent   TblVer  InQ OutQ Up/Down  
> State/PfxRcd
> x.x.x.x      4       yyyy 16718073  515900 20355657    0    0 4w6d        
> 79513
> x.x.x.x      4       yyyy 11846634   99091 20355657    0    0 9w6d       
> 159199
> x.x.x.x      4       yyyy 13888256  516045 20355657    0    0 9w6d       
> 159199
> 
> I'm filtering some stuff, but my understanding is that even without the 
> routes installed they do consume memory.
> 
> I can see a CPU hit at times from the BGP process if something flaps, but 
> it's not an OMGWTFBBQ sort of spike...
> 
> Charles
> 
> > 
> > Cheers                                        
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
                                          
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to