Did you only configure "mpls ip"? Do you have vpnv4 peers configured anywhere? Are you doing VRF lite on this router?
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Eric A Louie <[email protected]> wrote: > We implemented what seemed to be a pretty simple mpls configuration to > test a > vrf config. > > It caused widespread havoc across my production network. > > Has anyone encountered a situation where they've put "mpls ip" on a link > and had > it cause problems with web browsing to the Internet, even on traffic that > passed > through the router that was not going through the mpls ip interfaces? > > I have a case open with Cisco TAC but was looking for some additional > guidance > and perhaps some experience around this strange problem. > > Much appreciated, Eric > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
