I had two interfaces configured for vrf. No vrf lite configured. I used vpnv4 on the MP-BGP configuration, pointing to respective loopback interfaces.
Much appreciated, Eric ________________________________ From: Pete Lumbis <[email protected]> To: Eric A Louie <[email protected]> Cc: Cisco NSP <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, January 15, 2013 7:12:22 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] mpls ip creating traffic disturbance(s) Did you only configure "mpls ip"? Do you have vpnv4 peers configured anywhere? Are you doing VRF lite on this router? On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Eric A Louie <[email protected]> wrote: We implemented what seemed to be a pretty simple mpls configuration to test a >vrf config. > >It caused widespread havoc across my production network. > >Has anyone encountered a situation where they've put "mpls ip" on a link and had >it cause problems with web browsing to the Internet, even on traffic that passed >through the router that was not going through the mpls ip interfaces? > >I have a case open with Cisco TAC but was looking for some additional guidance >and perhaps some experience around this strange problem. > > Much appreciated, Eric >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
