> New ip addresses was configured as secondary on interfaces in question. > These new subnets (/30) appear in routing table, cef, etc. Network > statement also was added to ospf configuration.
Note that it at least *used* to be the case that OSPF wouldn't form adjacencies over secondary addresses. I don't know if this limitation still holds, but it could be relevant to your case. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
