On 2/20/13 6:13 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Mack McBride wrote: > >> At 768k you are effectively limiting your IPv6 table to 128k (you >> can't really go more than that if you expect to use IPv6). I recommend >> a 640k/192k split. > > Well, I believe IPv4 will hit 640k before IPv6 will hit 128k, so I'd > recommend 768k/128k instead. >
That's what I think too, unless there are too many unchecked idiots that decide to deaggregate their /30-32 into /48s. ~Seth _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
