On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Pete Lumbis wrote:

There are two pieces: control plane processing power and TCAM.

Sup720 CPU can't really keep up with the average churn of the internet
anymore. RSP720's and Sup2T CPUs can still keep up.

I'm using Sup720s, and not seeing that.

Both RSP720-3CXL and Sup2T-XL can support 1 million routes*

The Sup720 can do 1 million routes too. Can you point out where cisco says the implementation is any different between the Sup720, RSP720, and Sup2T that makes the latter capable of handling more v4/v6 routes than the former. Everything I've seen says the FIB TCAM space has not been improved.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
 Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to